Takuya Kumasaka vs Abhinav Sanjeev Shanmugam Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W L L W W
Form
W L W W W L W W W LHead-2-Head: Kumasaka 1 - 1 Shanmugam
They have played 6 sets in total, with Kumasaka winning 3 and Shanmugam winning 3. The last match between Kumasaka and Shanmugam was at the M15 Kuching, 02-08-2022, First, Hard with Takuya Kumasaka getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Takuya Kumasaka | 1 |
| Abhinav Sanjeev Shanmugam | 1 |
M15 Kuching(02-08-2022)
6
4
3
6
6
3
| Kumasaka | Stats | Shanmugam |
|---|---|---|
| 70% (16-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 74% (14-5) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 490 | Ranking | 877 |
| 476 | Highest Rank | 511 |
| 26 | Age | 26 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 57% (124-94) | Career Total W/L | 52% (158-143) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Raducanu VS Kostyuk PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Comesana VS Fils PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Takuya Kumasaka
Player
Abhinav Sanjeev Shanmugam
64%
(
61 of
96)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
82)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
39 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
88
|
||||
| 6-3 3-6 6-4 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 28 | Games Won | 28 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:25:0 | Average Match Time | 1:25:0 |
| 64% (61/96) | 1st Serve % | 51% (42/82) |
| 67% (41/61) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (27/42) |
| 46% (16/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (22/40) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (3/7) |
| 40% (33/82) | Return Points Win % | 41% (39/96) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Takuya Kumasaka Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Takuya Kumasaka
Player
Yuta Kawahashi
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
6-7(2) 7-5 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Takuya Kumasaka
Player
Yuta Kikuchi
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Renta Tokuda
Player
Takuya Kumasaka
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
39 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(2) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Takuya Kumasaka
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
44 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Takuya Kumasaka
Player
Filip Peliwo
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
48%
(
40 of
84)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
63
|
6-0 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Takuya Kumasaka
Player
Ryo Tabata
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Takuya Kumasaka
Player
Kuan-Yi Lee
52%
(
11 of
21)
1st Serve %
44%
(
15 of
34)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
100%
(
11 of
11)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
35
Total Points Won
20
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Takuya Kumasaka
Player
Issei Okamura
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Takuya Kumasaka
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Abhinav Sanjeev Shanmugam Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Chirag Duhan
Player
Abhinav Sanjeev Shanmugam
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
51%
(
52 of
101)
11
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
28 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Abhinav Sanjeev Shanmugam
Player
Suraj R Prabodh
49%
(
49 of
101)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
18
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
32 of
41)
54%
(
28 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
35 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
77)
93
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Abhinav Sanjeev Shanmugam
Player
Lohithaksha Bathrinath
44%
(
32 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
12
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Dev Javia
Player
Abhinav Sanjeev Shanmugam
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
95)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
21 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
95)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Abhinav Sanjeev Shanmugam
Player
Raghav Jaisinghani
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 4-6 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Abhinav Sanjeev Shanmugam
Player
Vraj Gohil
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandr Binda
Player
Abhinav Sanjeev Shanmugam
54%
(
37 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
4
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
91)
81
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (124/94) | Win/Loss | 52% (158/143) |
| 55% (272/227) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (354/325) |
| 52% (2378/2178) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (3360/3189) |
| 59% (102/72) | Hard Win/Loss | 51% (123/118) |
| 51% (20/19) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (35/25) |
| 40% (2/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.33 |
| 267 | Aces Total | 1052 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 284 | Total Double Faults | 481 |
| 1:28:2 | Average Match Time | 1:4:27 |
| 475.13 | Average Opponent Rank | 394.72 |
| 62% (6784/11017) | 1st Serve % | 54% (6646/12309) |
| 64% (4313/6784) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (4731/6646) |
| 50% (2101/4233) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2810/5663) |
| 45% (597/1327) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (409/996) |
| 43% (4894/11264) | Return Points Win % | 36% (4346/11926) |
| 45% (9/11) | Challenger W/L | 37% (7/12) |
| 58% (115/83) | Futures W/L | 54% (151/131) |
| 55% (115/208) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (155/298) |
| 100% (5/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 48% (23/48) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (39/87) |
| 56% (35/63) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (38/78) |
| 88% (112/99) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (159/141) |
| 11% (112/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (159/18) |
| 22% (106/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (142/16) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
